私募

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz

" For the expert conclusions

2015-12-29 05:11 | woolrich outle, tn reuqin pas


Morning News (Reporter Yan Fei) ectopic pregnancy was deemed to treat acute enteritis, 29-year-old unmarried woman Xu misdiagnosed and died. After the incident,louboutin pas cher,?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, grieving parents Beijing West Straight River Union Hospital to court, claims more than 120 million. Yesterday morning, Chaoyang Court hearing of the case, and the court sentence the defendant to bear 80% of hospital responsibility, namely to compensate the plaintiff death compensation and mental solatium total of 68 million yuan.
?
According to Mr. Xu couple said that last October 21 20 am, the daughter of Xu sudden abdominal pain accompanied by nausea and vomiting, was sent to the defendant hospital. Doctor diagnosed as moderate anemia, acute gastroenteritis, and in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis and spasm pains way to stay in hospital for drug treatment. Shock here, daughter occurred many times. 22 am, Xu abdomen, lower back pain intensified,?item create_form 1, Doctor only gave her an injection of painkillers,http: harako.qee.jp, but her condition did not improve.
?
"Midnight the next day, her daughter lost consciousness, blood pressure is zero, but the nurse on duty was prescribed to continue infusion. Families of repeated requests, the doctor on duty came to the clinic, but played only needle painkiller." Xu said the couple, daughters confusion, they had to call 120 for an ambulance. Emergency personnel initial diagnosis in transit is hemorrhagic shock, suspected ectopic pregnancy. Chuiyangliu after her daughter was transferred to hospital,?article7, on 22 October 3 pm pronounced dead. After the turn the hospital diagnosed an ectopic pregnancy Xu left isthmus leading to rupture, causing hemorrhagic shock and death. The plaintiffs believe that the diagnosis and treatment of the defendant's delay the timing of treatment, leading to her death, which should take full responsibility. & Nbsp;
?
"We were very apologetic for the plaintiff! Medical conditions and the level of our hospital has its limitations, so the consequence is not our doctors deliberate. Identification of units found to bear most of the responsibility we have, we are willing to compensation according to law." The hospital's agent believes ,http: libir.soka.ac.jp,nike tn pas cher, the plaintiff's claim has some irrational part, for example, some expenses repeated assertion; deceased father has income, ask for their dependents living expenses, etc. have no legal basis.
?
■ view clash
?
In the end who should bear responsibility?
?
Medical identification: the defendant hospital kept most of negligence, the theory of compensation 75%
?
The trial, the judge read out the results of medical identification. Appraisal concludes that, taking into account the limitations of medical conditions and the level of the defendant, that the defendant comprehensive analysis existence negligence in the death of most patients, the suggestion that compensation coefficient of 75%, the compensation reference range is 60% to 90%. The defendant hospital endorse the expert conclusions, but added that at that time because the doctor thinks the patient is unmarried, without their gynecological B ultrasonic examination, thus causing the consequences.
?
Family of the deceased: what is wrong with the treatment of patients,louboutin soldes pas cher, why 25% loss from fear
?
"The remaining 25 percent of the losses borne by whom? What fault do patients have?" For the expert conclusions, the plaintiff couples unacceptable. They believe that ectopic pregnancy is a common disease, doctors should be able to reach the level of checking the disease situation. Not because of the death of her daughter's hospital is a hospital, their medical conditions and level of limitations, but the sense of responsibility and ethical issues of health care caused. They believe that the patient came to the defendant hospital, because doctors irresponsible,moncler Outlet, and ultimately to death by the patient to bear 25% of losses, from the legal,, moral and reason say nowhere.
?
Court: the plaintiff insufficient other evidence to confirm the hospital bear responsibility for 80%
?
Court after hearing that the judicial verification organization, the defendant in the patient's treatment process is at fault, there are checks and differential diagnosis is not sufficient and failed to clear underestimation of the disease and the severity of the disease improper and negligence, resulting in delays diagnosis and treatment. The improper and negligent role to play most of the deaths in the results. Second,woolrich outlet milano,http: pescuitvrancea.ro, although the plaintiff believes should bear all the losses, but did not include other valid evidence, it is admissible in the court expert opinion, confirm the discretion of the defendant's liability ratio of 80%.
?
■ news
?
Misdiagnosed patient hospital postoperative infection
?
Morning News (Reporter Wu new) Yang patients in a hospital to do the surgery, the results of knee swelling, was confirmed as infected. She successfully sued the hospital, claims 230,000 yuan. Yesterday,?id=85283, reporters learned that the Beijing Intermediate Court of Final Appeal ruled that the defendant hospital compensation for more than 60,000 yuan.
?
Ms. Yang plaintiff alleged that in March 2007, she was double knee pain to the Beijing hospital treatment at a hospital, the hospital examination after the proposed line on the right total knee replacement surgery. Surgery done in the hospital after discharge, Ms. Yang knee joint swelling and pain, has been confirmed as infected. Yang believes that the defendant hospital's misdiagnosis, caused her physical and mental agony. She ask for compensation for medical expenses, disability compensation, disability aids fees totaling 230,000 yuan.
?
Court of First Instance that, since the defendant hospital negligence in the diagnosis and treatment of Ms. Yang, her postoperative infection, so the hospital should be according to their degree of fault, for economic losses caused to Ms. Yang, bear civil liability.
?
?Share: welcome to comment I want to comment
?Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN056)

路过

鸡蛋

鲜花

握手

雷人

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 立即注册

QQ|手机版|Archiver| ( 桂ICP备12001440号-3 )|网站地图

GMT+8, 2024-6-3 20:13 , Processed in 0.042519 second(s), 17 queries .

Powered by www.simu001.cn X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

返回顶部